Personal Secession for Liberty Now

To get clear about something here. Yes, once one has filed the Declaration, one will be in a state of Anarchy, which means simply No-Ruler and No-Government. Those opposed to anarchy, largely the left, have managed to add other words to that definition, usually ?chaos?. Chaos is not a correct definition, but merely a possible effect envisioned by those who will not understand Liberty.

Yes, after so many centuries where this entire Earth has been usurped by Rulers and Dictators, anarchy will surely take some getting used to! For now let?s just say that it will not take long before people come to realize that their control extends only within their own circle of family and friends, and that to step over that line is an intrusion which can be hazardous.

Pages might be contributed about that transition period, and once we have spread Personal Secession around America, we will be busy helping with solutions to such situations.

For the moment, it must suffice to say that anarchy can be but a momentary situation. It would be a huge mistake to form a replacement ?GOVERNment? because such matters can quickly be tended to via private Voluntary Associations.

We can expect that very small ?family? Estates will be quickly merged with others to quickly ally for mutual protection and benefit.

Although we may feel certain that the collectivist left will initially be most unhappy with Secession of any kind which denies their power and control (Force) , There is nothing to prevent formation of own collectivist States. Being unable to lean on productive free-market people for sustenance will be their quick lesson in morality.

John, sorry for some delay while traveling. I have yes, studied a bit on the UCC, redemption, strawman, etc. Perhaps some of that will be useful as a part of secession, at least for those who enjoy getting entangled in legalese.

The problem I have with all that is, in effect, when one owns and resides within his own “State”, having declared himself to be no longer a citizen or subject of any other ‘govern’ment which fraudulently imposed itself upon him, then we must consider ourselves no longer subject to the rules of the “Rulers”. Therefore it would be a paradox to attend a hearing in their courts and/or to allow ourselves to be subject to and obey their laws, which one has already rejected by virtue of the secession.

There may well be value in the Redemption process being used in secession documents and actions. I’m interested in your further thoughts on this!